By Farooq A. Kperogi, Ph.D. Twitter: @farooqkperogi Gov. Nasir El-Rufai loves to flaunt his appointment of "non-indigenes"...
By Farooq A. Kperogi,
Ph.D.
Twitter: @farooqkperogi
Gov. Nasir El-Rufai loves to flaunt his appointment of
"non-indigenes" in his government as evidence of his cosmopolitanism.
I know at least five top appointees of his who are not—and have never claimed
to be—from Kaduna State. In fact, his Senior Adviser on Media and Communication
is a Yoruba man by the name of Muyiwa Adekeye. Yet during a May 4, 2018 rabble-rousing speech at a campaign rally in Kaduna, he called into question
the "indigeneity" of all three senators from his state—in addition to
tacitly imploring his supporters to visit violence on the senators when they
set feet on the state.
I have no knowledge of the ancestral provenance of the three
senators, but it doesn’t matter where their ancestors came from. What matters
is that they grew up in Kaduna State and identify with the state. If we were to
all shake our ancestral trees, we would be shocked by what falls from them. In
my May 7 Facebook status update on this issue, I pointed to a longstanding
whispering campaign in Kaduna that El-Rufai himself is descended from Ebira
ancestors in what is now Kogi State.
In response to the update, several people wrote to tell me
that El-Rufai’s paternal ancestors are Malian Fulani, not Ebira. But this
information just proves the point of my intervention: that our ethnic and
geographic identities are mere accidents, which are incidental to our humanity.
It’s both disappointing and hypocritical that a state governor would choose to
delegitimize his state’s senators by calling attention to their supposed
“foreignness” while taking credit for having a mind broad enough to appoint
“foreign” people in his government.
In his May 11, 2018 Business Day column titled “Genocide,
Hegemony and Power in Nigeria,” former Central Bank of Nigeria deputy governor
Dr. Obadiah Mailafia also singled out the entire Fulani ethnicity for “othering.”
I have to admit, though, that given the unchecked murderous fury of herders in
the part of Nigeria Mailafia identifies with, his rather over-the-top emotional
reaction is entirely legitimate and defensible. But in making his points, he
played fast and loose with some facts. I highlight only three:
1. He identified Shehu Shagari, Murtala Mohammed (“through
his mother”), Umaru Musa Yar’adua, and Buhari as Nigerian presidents “of the Fulani
ethnic extraction.” Well, when I lived in Katsina for a year, I learned that the
Musa Yar'adua family (of which the late President Umaru Musa Yar'adua was a
scion) isn't, as Mailafia claims, Fulani; it is patrilineally Tuareg (the
Tuareg are a branch of the Berber cluster in North Africa), whom Hausa people
call Buzu. Another prominent Buzu family in northern Nigeria that people
mistake for Fulani is the Baba-Ahmed family in Mailafia's Kaduna State.
Similarly, the late Murtala Mohammed's paternal identity is
the subject of elaborate, long-standing speculations, none of which points to a
Fulani ethnicity. The most credible, in my opinion, is the speculation that his
father was from northern Edo State. A man by the name of Austin Braimoh, who
says he is Murtala’s paternal first cousin, wrote in a February 19, 2016 Vanguard article titled “Remembering Murtala Mohammed” that Murtala’s father's name was Dako Mohammed and that he migrated
to Kano from the village of Igbe in the Auchi area of Edo State via Lagos.
Given the number of "Auchi" people who rose to prominence in the Kano
society, this speculation isn't far-fetched. We know, of course, that his
mother was a member of the powerful Inuwa Wada family in Kano, but if Mailafia
can arbitrarily use matrilineal lineage to determine Murtala’s ethnicity, then
he should also denude Buhari of his Fulani ethnicity since Buhari's mother is
half Hausa and half Kanuri.
2. There are two incumbent elected presidents in West Africa
who self-identify as Fulani: Macky Sall of Senegal and Adama Barrow of the
Gambia. The Fulani are just about 18 percent of Senegal’s population and 21
percent of the Gambia’s. Ahmadou Ahidjo, a Fulani man, was also Cameroon's
president (actually the country's first president) from 1960 to 1982, even
though the Fulani are only 10 percent of Cameroon's population. So Mailafia's
notion of universally reviled, unredeemable Fulani demons whom no nation in
West Africa wants to entrust with leadership at the highest level which,
according to him, “explains why the Fulani have turned their attention to
Nigeria,” is not supported by the facts. Not everyone, obviously, is as
obsessed with unreflective ethnic particularism as Mailafia is.
3. Mailafia's ethnic essentialist arguments are also perched
on a thin thread of evidence. All scholars of identity will tell you that identity
is fiction, even if it's emotionally valid, politically consequential fiction.
Mailafia himself has said several times that he is part Fulani. The truth is,
no one is pure anything. Whether we know it or not, we are all ethnic
"mongrels” trapped in what Jean-Loup Amselle calls "mestizo
logics."
My recent interest in recreational genetics has solidified
the truth of this mestizo logic of our ethnicity for me. I did an ancestry DNA test for my mother and me a few months ago and found that I am 14 percent Asanti (I
was able to determine the ethnicity because Ancestry.com's database matched my
mother with a 4th cousin from Ghana who turned out to be a New York-based
Asanti man from Accra), 17 percent Malian (I haven't determined what Malian
ethnicity it is, but I suspect it’s Bambara), 33 percent Benin Republic/Togo,
and 34 percent Nigerian. (One percent is from Senegal and another one percent
from Congo/Cameroon).
My mother had not the foggiest idea that she had any
ancestors from the Asanti. No one ever mentioned it to her. I knew she had
Malian ancestry from the clan names of her forebears (“Manneh” and “Toure”),
which are names Bambara/Mandinka/Mandingo/Malinke/Jula, etc. people bear in
Mali, Senegal, the Gambia, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Sierra Leone, etc. But the oral
history that was handed down to her says her ancestors came from Katsina and
Borno. I have a slightly higher Malian DNA than she does, which means my father
has a little bit of Malian bloodline, too.
It's known to geneticists
that several people in Mali, Guinea, the Gambia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, etc.
embody complex ethnic alchemies, so it's reductionist to talk of ethnicity in
the essentialist terms that Mailafia did in his article. For instance, Alpha
Konare, Mali's president from 1992 to 2008, was born by a Fulani mother and a
Bambara father, but he self-identifies as Bambara. The country's first
president, Modibo Keita, has a Fulani first name, although he didn't
self-identify as Fulani. Several Guinean presidents who self-identified as
Mandinka had Fulani mothers or grandmothers. If we use the matrilineal logic of
identity that Mailafia deployed to assign a Fulani ethnicity to Murtala
Mohammed, many Guinean presidents would also qualify as Fulani.
My own attitude to identity is that people are who they say—
and believe— they are, even if that's not necessarily who they are. But given the
originary syncretism of all modern ethnic identities, Mailafia's misguided nativist
logic of Nigerian citizenship (which alienates even the Fulani people whose
ancestors have been here before Nigeria was conceived) is politically inconsequential
fiction.
No comments
Share your thoughts and opinions here. I read and appreciate all comments posted here. But I implore you to be respectful and professional. Trolls will be removed and toxic comments will be deleted.