By Farooq A. Kperogi, Ph.D. Twitter: @farooqkperogi You don’t have to be enamored with Chief Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s politics to concede ...
By Farooq A. Kperogi,
Ph.D.
Twitter:
@farooqkperogi
You don’t have to be enamored with Chief Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s
politics to concede that he is, for now, the nonpareil political hegemon of
Nigeria’s Southwest. Sure, his hegemonic
hold over the region’s political space isn’t total and unchallenged, but it’s remarkably
preeminent nonetheless.
I am deploying the term “hegemony” not in its contemporary,
everyday sense, but as it was used and popularized by Italian Marxist theorist
Antonio Gramsci. Gramsci theorized hegemony as the way the ruling classes in
capitalist society perpetuate their dominance by making their values seem
“natural” and “common sense,” which encourages oppressed people to identify
with their oppressors without a twinge of psychic discomfort. Most people
think, for instance, that it’s “natural” and “common sense” to want to make
profit at the expense of the physical and creative labors of others. It’s not.
Hegemonic cooptation of all classes in the society is
achieved through artful consensus building and through the persuasive narrative
construction of the core values of the ruling classes. This requires that the
consent of subordinate classes be perpetually won and re-won voluntarily, for,
as Gramsci pointed out, “people’s material social experiences constantly remind
them of the disadvantages of subordination and thus poses a threat to the
dominant class.”
Tinubu has succeeded, to a large degree, in seamlessly meshing
his self-interested acquisitiveness and insatiable thirst for power with the “Yoruba
agenda” or the “Yoruba interest.” Many, certainly not all, well-meaning Yoruba
people take it as “common sense” that Tinubu is the “leader,” or, if you will,
the apotheosis, of the Yoruba people in contemporary Nigeria who looks out for
and defends their interest. This hegemonic narrative enjoys the purchase of a
vast swathe of the region’s intellectual, media, and social elites.
I have read people opine that Tinubu used his enormous
wealth to buy the consciences of many otherwise critical minds in the region;
that these otherwise critical people are his pitiful, acquiescent poodles
because they can’t risk severing their financial umbilical cord with him. That’s
simplistic. While I won’t discount the influence of money in buying the silence
and loyalty of otherwise clear-minded people, the truth is that once an idea
becomes hegemonic, people buy in or accede to it out of social pressure, out of
anxieties about social ostracism. We call it the spiral of silence in
communication theory.
For instance, before his death, the late Chief Gani
Fawehinmi became something of a social pariah in the Southwest because of this
relentless opposition to Tinubu and his intrepid quest to pry open the ethical dirt Tinubu hides in
plain sight in his cracked closet. Most people don’t have the emotional stamina
to defy and confront the ferocious attacks and smears Fawehinmi contended with,
so they just toe the line of least resistance by conforming to normative
expectations.
However, as Gramsci pointed out, hegemony is always a site
of contestation, which explains why the consent of people who buy in to it has
to be earned and re-earned in perpetuity. Afenifere used to be the hegemonic political
force in the Southwest. But Tinubu and his forces have diluted the group’s
dominance. Tinubu’s own dominance is also now being repugned by a multiplicity
of subaltern political forces in the region.
The February 2019 election will determine if Tinubu’s
hegemonic hold over politics in the Southwest will be strengthened or weakened.
My sense is that it will be weakened—if not extirpated outright. Here is why.
Tinubu is going into another alliance with Buhari in hopes that Buhari and his
supporters will reward him with a presidential ticket in 2023. That’s a costly
miscalculation for a whole host of reasons.
I am familiar enough with members of Buhari’s inner circle
to know that they deeply despise Tinubu. They snigger at his presidential
ambition and are amused by his expectation that they would support him. Tinubu
himself knows this. That’s why I am shocked that he appears irresistibly and
dangerously drawn to people who will throw him like he is hot after the
February election. Maybe he is gripped by the sort of deathly attraction that
causes a moth to embrace a flame.
During a TV appearance on Television Continental on February 20, 2018, Tinubu’s wife, Remi, said Tinubu was “trashed” by Buhari’s
northern political machine after the 2015 election. People who “trashed” you
after an electoral triumph to which you’re central will certainly go the whole
hog and incinerate or bury you in the aftermath of another victory that will
ensure that they will no longer need you.
Apart from the certain betrayal that will surely come from
the Buhari camp in the event that Tinubu helps them to win or rig the 2019
election, a Tinubu presidential candidacy will be beset by a lot of problems.
Given the heightened sensitivity of religion in Nigeria now, which is made even
more so by Buhari’s unexampled, in-your-face bigotry, Tinubu would be required
to have a northern Christian as a running mate to earn the support of the south
and the Christian north. That would, however, automatically alienate Buhari’s
northern Muslim supporters. So his ambition is dead before it’s even born.
Most importantly, though, as Tinubu himself knows only too
well, a vote for APC in the coming presidential election won't be a vote for
Buhari; it would be a vote for an evil, greedy, corrupt, provincial, and reactionary
cabal and their minions who are currently perpetrating a stratospheric theft of
the nation's resources in ways that would make an angel of Abacha. President
Buhari is an insentient human vegetable who is barely aware of his own
existence.
Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, Tinubu’s dutiful protégé, is
worse than a figurehead vice president. The cabal habitually humiliates him to
his face and denudes him of any real powers. Every time Buhari handed over
power to him when he traveled to London, the Villa always became a tumultuous,
feuding house.
When former DSS boss Lawal Musa Daura instructed his men to
invade the National Assembly, Osinbajo was not in on the decision, even though
he was the "acting" president. When he inquired why he was not
consulted, he was insulted and humiliated by members of the cabal. He fired
Daura in exasperation. But the man is practically back. He nominated the
current DG, Yusuf Magaji Bichi, and is actually the man who still runs the DSS.
Every decision VP Osinbajo took when Buhari was away has been reversed or
vitiated upon Buhari's return. Check the records.
This would be worse in a Buhari second term when the cabal
no longer needs to pretend in order to earn the goodwill of the Southwest. The
dissension between the cabal and the southwest political establishment led by
Tinubu and Osinbajo would reach a feverish pitch. A degenerative, vegetative
Buhari would be oblivious, and the nation would burn to the ground. You need no
oracular powers to know that this would happen. At that point, Tinubu's minions
in the news media and the currently quiescent civil society organizations would
resume their trademark barking and tarring all northerners with the same brush.
By then, it would be too late.
No comments
Share your thoughts and opinions here. I read and appreciate all comments posted here. But I implore you to be respectful and professional. Trolls will be removed and toxic comments will be deleted.