By Farooq A. Kperogi, Ph.D. Twitter: @farooqkperogi The Wall Street Journal’s disturbing July 31 report of the secret mass burial of ...
By Farooq A. Kperogi,
Ph.D.
Twitter:@farooqkperogi
The Wall Street Journal’s disturbing July 31 report of the secret mass burial of at least a
thousand Nigerian soldiers who were murdered by Boko Haram terrorists has, once
again, brought to the fore the conscienceless villainy and duplicity of the Buhari regime and its illegal service
chiefs who have overstayed their statutorily mandated length of service by several months.
The regime never stops to claim that it has “defeated” Boko
Haram even when indisputable evidence to the contrary stares it in the face. In
late last year, for instance, it was reported that Boko Haram had murdered
hundreds of Nigerian soldiers. Yet the federal government did not consider it
fitting to acknowledge the tragedy, much less condole with the families of the
deceased soldiers.
In fact, on the day the fallen soldiers were given an undignified
mass burial, Buhari met with APC senators who’d threatened to defect to other
parties. Several reports have also surfaced to show that soldiers fighting on
the frontlines are owed several months’ worth of allowances and that many of them
are now practically beggars.
TheCable’s September 21, 2018 investigations show that the
military men fighting Boko Haram are practically being forced to commit suicide
because they are severely ill equipped. I also shared videos on Facebook and
Twitter yesterday of Nigerian soldiers battling what seem like Boko Haram
terrorists with obsolete, barely functional guns. That’s why they are sitting
ducks for Boko Haram. They are on a government-sanctioned mass suicide mission.
In other words, there is no difference between President
Goodluck Jonathan and Muhammadu Buhari in the prosecution of the war against
Boko Haram. Well, the only difference is that the Buhari regime has been more
effective in muzzling the press, in intimidating private individuals in the
northeast into not disclosing the true situation of the Boko Haram insurgency
in the region, and in enlisting well-heeled individuals in its propaganda
efforts.
What is now coming to light in spite of government’s
studious efforts to suppress it supports my column of February 24, 2018 titled
“Bursting the Myth of Buhari’s Boko Haram ‘Success’.” Almost everything I said
in that column is bubbling to the surface now. The sanguinary in-fighting among
Boko Haram members, which I said was the biggest reason for the lull in its
attacks between 2016 and early 2018, has now subsided considerably.
I have taken the liberty to reproduce portions of my
previous article, which seemed incredulous to many people when it was first
published:
A false narrative that several people cherish about the
Buhari government is the notion that its singular greatest achievement is its
success in containing, downgrading, or defeating Boko Haram. It’s like a
consolation prize to compensate for the government’s abject failure in every
index of governance. I recognize that taking away the consolation prize of
Buhari’s Boko Haram success narrative would cause psychic and cognitive
dislocation in many people…
But the question I always ask people who talk of the Buhari
administration’s “success” in “downgrading” or “technically defeating” Boko
Haram (whatever in the world that means) is: what exactly has Buhari done that
hasn’t been done by his predecessor to bring about his so-called success? The
only intelligent answer I’ve received is that he ordered the relocation of the
command center for Nigeria's military operation against Boko Haram to
Maiduguri. Well, that’s commendable, but it conceals the unchanged, sordid underbelly
of military authorities.
For instance, the military is still severely underfunded and
ill-equipped. Soldiers on the front lines are still owed backlogs of
allowances; several of them still starve and survive on the goodwill of
do-gooders. Two videos of the heartrending conditions of our military men
fighting Haram went viral sometime ago, and military authorities were both
embarrassed and caught flatfooted. I periodically speak with my relatives and
friends in the military fighting Boko Haram, and they say little or nothing has
changed, except that propaganda and media management have become more
effective. The fat cats in the military still exploit and feed fat on the
misery of the foot soldiers.
Even on the symbolic plane, which is the easiest to
navigate, Buhari hasn’t been better than his predecessor. He did not visit our
foot soldiers in Borno to boost their morale nor did he visit IDPs whose misery
has become one of the most horrendous humanitarian disasters in the world. He
only visited Borno on October 1, 2017—more than 2 years after being in power—to
celebrate Independence Day with the military after so much pressure was brought
to bear on him by critics. There are three major reasons why the intensity of
the Boko Haram scourge has subsided, none of which has anything to do with Buhari’s
policies on Boko Haram.
One, our foot soldiers, like always, have never wavered in
their bravery and persistence in spite of their prevailing untoward conditions.
This isn’t because of the president; it is in spite of the president.
Two, Boko Haram has been weakened by an enervatingly bitter
and sanguinary internal schism. Since at least September 2016, the Abubakar
Shekau and Abu Musab al-Barnawi factions of Boko Haram have killed each other
more than the military has killed them.
Three, and most important, the conspiracy theories and
tacit, if unwitting, support that emboldened Boko Haram in the north because a
southern Christian was president have all but disappeared, making it easy for
the military to get more cooperation from the local population. Remember Buhari
said, in June 2013 in a Liberty Radio interview in Kaduna, that the military’s
onslaught against Boko Haram amounted to “injustice” against the “north.”
Babachir David Lawal, then a CPC politician, infamously said
Boko Haram was a PDP plot to “depopulate” the northeast because the region
doesn’t vote PDP. As my friend from the northeast noted on my Facebook page,
“Borno elder Shettima Ali Monguno used to call BH ‘our children’ and he only
stopped after he was kidnapped for ransom by the group.”
The Northern Elders Forum in 2013 said Boko Haram members
should be given amnesty, not killed. Even then PDP chairman Bamanga Tukur said
in 2011 that “Boko Haram is fighting for justice. Boko Haram is another name
for justice.” Several Borno elders and everyday citizens protected Boko Haram
members and frustrated the military.
In fact, in June 2012, Borno elders told the government of
the day to withdraw soldiers fighting Boko Haram terrorists from the state.
(But when the military dropped a bomb and killed scores of IDPs, these Borno
elders didn't even as much as say a word of condemnation.)
I published letters in 2014 from Borno readers of my column
that said the people would rather live with Boko Haram than cooperate with the
military because they believed the military was part of a grand plot to
annihilate them. The military was so frustrated that it almost wiped out the
entire village of Baga in April 2013 when residents provided cover for Boko
Haram insurgents who escaped into the area. I wrote to condemn the military at
the time.
All this changed because the president is no longer a
Christian from the south. Buhari isn’t just a northern Muslim; his mother is
half Kanuri, and that’s why most (certainly not all) people from the region
intentionally exaggerate the extent of safety and security in the region even
when the facts give the lie to their claims. It's all ethnic solidarity.
Because someone with some Kanuri blood in him is president,
Boko Haram is no longer a plot to depopulate the northeast. No northern elder
is pleading amnesty on the group’s behalf. The group is no longer fighting “for
justice.” Killing them is no longer “injustice” to the “north.” And everything
is now hunky-dory. Ethno-regional bigotry will be the death of Nigeria.
The needful has been Said by you sir,in 1978 when Buhari was the PTF chairman a tune of #12Billion got missing and in 2018 the tune of #26billion NNPC Funds got missing too and he claims a Saint. Buhari remains an enemy of Nigeria.
ReplyDeleteStill in fears over the assassination threat you wrote on Facebook about in the morning. Buhari and Blood are synonymous
ReplyDeleteYou seem to relish in conspiracy theories and contradictory statements. There are notable successes by the Buhari government against Boko Haram, eg a lot of territory has been secured from the group and, contrary to your misinformation, we in Nigeria know how daunting the task of resettling IDPs is and what governments are doing about it. Fighting insurgency by non-conventional warfare is by no means easy, as Americans, NATO and Afghan government are finding out in Afghanistan after almost 20 years of conflict in that harpless country trying to defeat the Taliban. The same tactics that the Taliban are using in Afghanistan are also being employed by Boko Haram in Nigeria - ambushes, preemptive attacks on civilian and military targets, using local sympathizers and propaganda, and of course the role of commentators like you who are not in the conflict zones but claim to know every detail of what's happening there. Like some of the people you mentioned in your article, you seem more eager to magnify the "successes" of Boko Haram than to praise the efforts of the government in prosecuting the war. It's all part of your anti-Buhari agenda.
ReplyDeleteProf, the so-called relocation of command centre to Maiduguri (and that of police to Benue) is just Buhari dramatic propaganda. It was GEJ who created the 7th Division in Maiduguri with a GOC which is a more profound development that Buhari's drama of relocating command centre but I haven't heard the GEJ camp boasting about the 7th Division.
ReplyDelete