By Farooq A. Kperogi, Ph.D. Twitter: @farooqkperogi The All Progressives Congress (APC) subsists on lies and deceit, like its twin t...
By Farooq A. Kperogi, Ph.D.
Twitter: @farooqkperogi
The All Progressives Congress (APC) subsists on lies and
deceit, like its twin the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), but the party told a
fundamental truth on September 2 when it said in a statement, according to the
Sun, that Buhari’s “hiked petrol price, electricity tariff reflect [the] wishes
of [the] citizenry.”
This may come across as a bit counter-intuitive, but there is
no greater testimonial endorsement of the claim that Buhari’s steep, sudden
hikes in the prices of commodities, which have made Nigeria a snake pit of
infernal cruelty, reflect the wishes of Nigerians than the fact that there have
been no protests against the policies.
From the 1960s until Buhari ascended to the presidency,
every hike in petrol price had been greeted with massive protests. But not only
have there been no protests against Buhari’s punishing petrol price hikes, a whole
lot of people in the North actually came out in 2016 to stage demonstrations in
support of Buhari’s first petrol price increment and against opposition to it!
In 2012 when the Goodluck Jonathan administration
arbitrarily hiked the pump price of petrol, I was the first to suggest an “Occupy
Nigeria” strategy to force the government to reverse the hike. I didn’t
anticipate that my suggestion would fly. But it did. It meshed with the self-interested political agendas of people who are now in government and ignited a massive
social convulsion.
Four years later in 2016, I made the same appeal. But as I
pointed out in my May 14, 2016 column titled, “Petrol Price Hike: Time to
Occupy Nigeria Again,” the people and circumstances that conduced to the 2012
Occupy Nigeria protests had changed.
“But I doubt that my appeal will resonate with many people
this time around; President Buhari’s tight emotional grip on the northern and
southwestern middle class would likely frustrate the formation of the kind of
remarkably unexampled pan-Nigerian solidarity that confronted former President
Jonathan,” I wrote.
Well, sheepish acquiescence in the face of Buhari’s plot to
transform Nigeria into one massive mass grave through thoughtless and callous
hikes in the prices of everything that is essential to survival is proof that
the APC is right to insist that Buhari’s morally objectionable suffocation of
Nigeria reflects the wishes of Nigerians.
I made these points four years ago, and I will repeat them
because the circumstances warrant their repetition: Every responsible, socially
sensitive government subsidizes essential commodities for its citizens. It is
only Nigerian governments that interminably tell their citizens that they have
no responsibility to make life a little easier for the people they govern.
According to a January 3, 2012 TIME Magazine story titled
“Petrol Politics: Why Nigerians Are Enraged Over the Rising Price of Gasoline,”
America’s 50 states collectively spend $10 billion a year to subsidize the fuel
consumption of their citizens.
In America, with all
its vast material prosperity, the surest way for any government to collapse
irretrievably is to encourage any policy that causes the price of petrol to go
up. As TIME put it beautifully, “One of
the fastest ways to alienate voters is to be seen supporting anything that
intensifies pain in the pump.”
It said, “politicians’ refusal to increase gas taxes in line
with inflation and construction costs starves needed infrastructure of
funding.” Sounds familiar? The recurrent excuse governments in Nigeria advance
to increase fuel prices is that the government needs money for “infrastructural
development.”
But no sensible government starves its people to death because it
wants to build infrastructure. Only the living use infrastructure.
There is an instructive example in the Midwestern state of
Iowa of how a caring government, faced with a cash crunch, responded to
recommendations for an increase in petrol prices to raise money. I will
reproduce parts of the story, which is from TIME, without authorial
intervention:
“In Iowa, which hasn’t raised its tax in 22 years, a citizen
advisory panel recommended an 8 cent to 10 cent bump per gallon in November.
Republican Gov. Terry Branstad quickly took any increase off the table, instead
asking his Department of Transportation to look for savings.
“‘Everyone realizes that we need more funding for roads and
bridges,’ said Tim Albrecht, a spokesman for Branstad. ‘I don’t think the
legislature was especially willing to put a burden on Iowa’s taxpayers at this time.’”
Governments don’t save in Nigeria. All they do is raid the
national treasury to subsidize their lavish lifestyles (and those of their
cronies) and tell the masses of the people that they don’t deserve any subsidy.
Nigeria isn’t poor because of the need of its people; it is in dire straits
because of the greed of its elites.
But everyday Nigerians who feel the pinch of the cruelty of
their elites would rather expend their energies to fight for God than fight for
themselves. The same Nigerians who fly into a tempestuous holy rage and demand
the blood of their fellow humans when their God is “blasphemed” are asking for
their God’s intervention— instead of acting— now that Buhari is determined to
kill them piecemeal through cruel hikes in the prices of everything essential
to their existence.
They kill fellow humans in defense of their God but ask God
to defend them against an oppressor who is killing them by other means—and
looking the other way while kidnappers and terrorists periodically murder them
in the hundreds.
If you have the capacity to defend God, shouldn’t you have
an even greater capacity to defend yourself against murderous oppressors since
self-preservation is said to be the first law of nature? Or is
“God-preservation” and self-annihilation the first law of nature in Nigeria?
If God, with his omnipotent powers, can’t deal with
blasphemers on his own but needs your defense, why and how do you think he can
defend you against a man who is—-or people who are— smoldering you?
Nigerians aren’t victims of Buhari; they’re willing
participants in and enablers of his vicious asphyxiation of Nigeria. There’s
nothing that he’s doing now that he hasn’t been doing since at least 2016. Read
my past columns: you’d think they were written in response to Nigeria’s current
existential torments.
For instance, on December 6, 2016, I wrote: “I used to say
that it was impossible for any Nigerian president to be worse than Jonathan….
So in May 2015, I started out investing enormous hopes in Buhari to transform
Nigeria and to build enduring institutions.
“After waiting 6 months to appoint a predictable, lackluster
cabinet, it became clear to me that my hopes were misplaced, that Buhari wasn’t
prepared to be president, so I scaled backed my expectations and hoped that
Buhari would at least be minimally better than Jonathan.
“But when Buhari hiked fuel prices, reversed the few
crumbling subsidies that sustained the poor, and became a prisoner of the
‘Washington Consensus,’ I scaled back my expectations again and hoped that
Buhari would be just as bad as Jonathan was.
“When his government’s incredibly inept husbandry of the
economy continued to deepen the recession it instigated in the first place with
its wrongheaded policies, I hoped that Buhari would just be slightly worse than
Jonathan for the sake of Nigeria’s survival.
“Now with the unceasing rash of counter-intuitive, mutually
contradictory, insanely irrational, and thoughtless policy prescriptions from
this government, the very foundation of the country is tanking before our very
eyes, and I just hope Buhari never does anything again till 2019 when his
tenure will expire—and with it the torment he is inflicting on Nigeria. A
stagnant, do-nothing Buhari is now better for the country than this madness
we’re witnessing! Nigeria is fast sinking to the nadir of despair and
ruination.”
Nothing has changed. Nigerians can only show that their
plight isn’t a reflection of their wishes if they damn the consequences and
fight the source of their misery.
Prof, the apparent contradiction in the attitudes of northern Nigerians towards blasphemy on one hand, and towards cruel leaders on the other is a reflection of their slavish compliance with the self-serving interpretation of Islamic scripture by clerics in the North. The primary driver of virtually all Northern attitudes is Islamic preaching which, in the age of the internet and satellite TV, is available in abundance to every Muslim. It is the clerics who regularly cite Hadiths (Prophetic traditions) that legislate stern action against blasphemy as well as those that discourage protests against leaders while recommending prayers for them instead. But in fairness to the Hadiths, none of them advocates the mob actions that we see in northern Nigeria in response to blasphemy; all the punishments recommended are judicial. The mob actions are a consequence of the manipulation of the Malams who apply a lot of anger and emphasis when preaching about blasphemy, which their followers take to be a call to mob action. Most northern attitudes flow from the messages of its preachers and the easiest way to understand northerners is to listen to their Islamic preachers. I always tell me friends that the North cannot get ahead of its Islamic preaching and it can only change when the preaching changes.
ReplyDeleteMarvellous.
DeleteProf, the apparent contradiction in the attitudes of northern Nigerians towards blasphemy on one hand, and towards cruel leaders on the other is a reflection of their slavish compliance with the self-serving interpretation of Islamic scripture by clerics in the North. The primary driver of virtually all Northern attitudes is Islamic preaching which, in the age of the internet and satellite TV, is available in abundance to every Muslim. It is the clerics who regularly cite Hadiths (Prophetic traditions) that legislate stern action against blasphemy as well as those that discourage protests against leaders while recommending prayers for them instead. But in fairness to the Hadiths, none of them advocates the mob actions that we see in northern Nigeria in response to blasphemy; all the punishments recommended are judicial. The mob actions are a consequence of the manipulation of the Malams who apply a lot of anger and emphasis when preaching about blasphemy, which their followers take to be a call to mob action. Most northern attitudes flow from the messages of its preachers and the easiest way to understand northerners is to listen to their Islamic preachers. I always tell me friends that the North cannot get ahead of its Islamic preaching and it can only change when the preaching changes.
ReplyDeleteExactly the point I have been making for a while now. It is very strange that there is a criminal conspiracy of silence from all quarters on Buhari's handling of the affairs of this country. It is clear from our actions and inactions that we all deserve the government we have.
ReplyDeleteDr.You said it all, Religious and Ethics wouldn't allow Nigerians to fight for the right things.
ReplyDeleteApt as always... And like John Maxwell says, "Great leaders always seem to embody two seemingly disparate qualities. They are both highly visionary and highly practical." .... Buhari has none of these attributes. If anything, he represents the antithesis of these attributes.
ReplyDeleteProf, perhaps God will hold Nigerians responsible dragging his name to the mud. From Mohammed Bello's submission above, it is clear that the preachers has rather promote their words instead of God's.
ReplyDeleteThanks Prof. May you live long to see the best you wish for your father land. Always welcome.
ReplyDeleteThank you for another masterpiece.
ReplyDeleteI have taken a few lines to be posted on my Facebook wall with due acknowledgement.
Thank you Prof.